I’d like to be able to add something to this knowledge. My PhD research is partly driven by the desire to discover the will to be a mentor for students on placement. It's a role that isn't enjoyed by all nurses and some seem to have a greater propensity than others for supporting and educating students in the workplace. Also, I wonder if there is a relationship between the strength of their professional will and their will to be mentors.
As Barnett pointed out, there can be tensions in the doctor-patient repationship when the doctor has the ideal patient in mind and the patient has the ideal doctor in mind and between them the relationship is worked out. I can see parallels here with the mentor-student relationship. Some of the mentors in my research have described characteristics of their "ideal student", and there is plenty reported in the literature from the student viewpoint of ideal characeristics of mentors. According to Barnett, the will has to be continually nurtured and re-nurtured (possibly because of these tensions?), but we don’t have a theory of what professionals do to maintain the will to be or become professional in the present, in the here and now. The educational challenge is of helping to form this professional will in such a way it will be durable. For nurse mentors, this nurturing of a professional will needs to take place at different levels:
The will exists in knowing, acting and being. Mentors are challenged to devise a space or spaces in which the acting and the knowing and the being relate to each other, both for themselves and their students.
Teasing out the relationship between what it means to be a professional and the life around the professional, it's clear that the professional is part of a wider community, but you have to question whether their own interior spaces provide resources for going on, amongst turbulence and uncertainty. Because, according to Barnett, the professional is able to critique the profession and move it forward, standing apart from the profession as well as part of it, it isn't sufficient to rely only on a community of practice to nurture the professional will. It will be useful to look out for signs of critiquing the profession in the themes and accounts that emerge in my data, and as I'm delving into thoughts and feelings, I may have some insight into the interior spaces of the mentors in my study.
To end this entry, I'd like to share this list of sources of the professional will that Barnett presented:
I think there is a lot of this coming through in my data from the mentors, so it will be exciting to see the parallels.
Hi Anthea,
ReplyDeleteI have a google search on the term *intersubjectivity* happening and your blog popped up this morning. I am a psychotherapist, and have been in the position of teaching many trainee therapists. I utterly adored the role of training and supervising. I just wanted to mention the attachment styles of student and teacher...and how these get played out in the way we are both effective and are blocked.
I am big into phenomenology and the importance of resisting *labeling* without scrutiny. However, I find the *attachment research on infants and consequently adults completely compelling.
Just thought i would make this comment.
Johanna
Hi Johanna
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry I missed your comment earlier. I went on leave and then thrown back into work. It's really interesting that you have been looking at the attachment research in relation to adult relationships - it's something I've been intending to do but haven't really got around to yet. There's some interesting papers on supervision of counsellors that I've been reading lately, e.g. Smythe et al (2009)"Professional supervision: trusting the wisdom that comes". Have you come across that?
Best wishes
Anthea